AI Over 40 Series - Week 17: How You Organize Your AI Work Matters More Than You Think

During a week at Directions EMEA in Poznań, Poland, where I presented ‘AI for the Over 40: From Skeptic to Evangelist,’ I had dozens of conversations with business leaders about their AI journeys. What struck me wasn’t what tools they were using — it was how they were organizing their AI work.
Or more accurately, how they weren’t.
Most people told me they had “memory” turned on in their AI tools and assumed that was enough. Business strategy conversations blended into personal planning. Client work mixed with internal initiatives. Strategic frameworks sat alongside one-off questions. Everything lived together, and over time, the AI responses started to feel… off.
That’s when it became clear: how you organize your AI work matters more than almost anything else.
The problem with “just turning on memory”
Modern AI tools do a decent job remembering facts about you — your role, preferences, recurring projects. But memory doesn’t preserve full conversations, detailed frameworks, or the progression of your thinking over time. It captures highlights, not depth.
When you combine personal, professional, strategic, and tactical conversations, memory is compelled to extract patterns from chaos. The result is conversational drift:
- A casual tone creeping into serious strategy work
- Client conversations referencing internal issues
- Professional writing pulling in personal examples
- Strategic decisions influenced by unrelated context
Memory isn’t broken. It’s doing exactly what it was designed to do — but it can’t replace intentional structure.
The solution: project containers
The fix isn’t better prompts or longer instructions. It’s projects.
Most AI platforms now support some form of project-based organization. A project is a bounded context container. Everything inside it — documents, conversations, accumulated knowledge — stays there. It doesn’t bleed into other work.
Think of it like this. Without projects, you’re working in one giant room where everything happens. With projects, you have separate rooms:
- Client work
- Strategic planning
- Personal development
- Content creation
When you enter a room, everything inside it is relevant. Nothing else is. That’s context hygiene.
How I accidentally built a living context architecture
I didn’t start with a grand system in mind. I just wanted to write a weekly article series without losing track of my ideas. By Week 8, I couldn’t remember which concepts I’d already covered. By Week 13, the series had outgrown what I could manage in my head.
The key realization was this: I didn’t want my article writing context bleeding into client work or strategic planning. Each type of work deserved its own container.
So I created a dedicated project for the AI for the Over 40 series — and everything changed.
Inside that project, I built three layers:
- A master reference document
This “project bible” compresses everything I’ve learned into core philosophies, frameworks, platform guidance, voice notes, and cross-references. It prevents drift and acts as a source of truth. - An evidence base
All published articles live in the project in full. Not summaries — the actual writing. This preserves authentic voice and makes it easy to reference how ideas were originally explained. - An active synthesis layer
Every new conversation inherits the accumulated context. I’m not starting from scratch each week — I’m building on everything that came before, without pulling in unrelated work.
Memory versus architecture
Memory extracts facts across everything you do. Architecture preserves full context within clear boundaries.
With projects:
- Context stays clean
- Voice remains consistent
- Frameworks compound instead of drifting
- You control exactly what the AI sees
This is the difference between hoping the AI guesses correctly and giving it the right environment to work in.
How to build your own
You don’t need a 52-week article series to benefit from this. Start small:
- Create your first project
Pick your most important AI work context and create a project for it. Name it clearly. - Add only what belongs
Be ruthless about boundaries. If it doesn’t support that specific type of work, it doesn’t go in. - Create a simple master reference
Capture purpose, key context, frameworks, voice, and — just as important — what does not belong. - Replicate where needed
Client work, strategy, personal development, content creation — each deserves its own container.
The bottom line
In Poznań, I saw leaders stuck not because AI memory wasn’t working, but because memory was trying to make sense of mixed contexts. The solution isn’t more memory. It’s better architecture.
You wouldn’t store all your business files in a single folder labeled “Stuff.” Don’t organize your AI work that way either.
Create project containers. Build living context architecture. Your AI will be clearer, more consistent, and far more effective — because it finally has the right context, not just memory’s best guess.
This post is part of my “AI Over 40” series. It first appeared on LinkedIn: AI for the Over 40 [Week 17]: Living Context Architecture – Why How You Organize Your AI Work Matters More Than You Think.
Next Up: When You Can Build What Doesn’t Exist.
Read more AI and Copilot blogs.
Trending Posts
Stay Informed
Choose Your Preferences
"*required" indicates required fields