Dynamics Business Central / NAV Developer Digest - Vol. 557

ArcherPoint by Cherry Bekaert’s Developer Digest focuses on Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Dynamics NAV development. This week’s volume includes a discussion of whether BC or Copilot is best for creating Agents and a comparison of SaaS environments.
The Dynamics 365 Business Central community, consisting of developers, project managers, and consultants, collaborates across various platforms to share valuable insights. At ArcherPoint, we greatly value their dedication and expertise. To ensure widespread access to this technical knowledge, we created Developer Digest.
Which is best for creating Agents: BC or Copilot Studio?
Bert Verbeek wraps up his series on Agents in Business Central with a sixth installment.
He reviews three ways to create agents:
- Copilot Studio
- Pro code agents with the Agent Framework
- Agents directly in Business Central
He also includes a useful table with suggestions on when to use agents in Business Central rather than Copilot Studio. He also includes comments on the pros and cons of agents in BC.
This is a fitting conclusion to an excellent series.
Check out Bert Verbeek’s blog, Agents in Business Central – part 6 – The conclusion.
Speaking of developing agents…
How does your company handle AI agent development?
Waldo describes how he managed the process at his company by creating company guidelines and agents in VS Code. The process worked: rapid adoption, standardized processes, and a low-to-no learning curve.
But the fly in the ointment was that they might have robbed the developers of the trial-and-error that is part of learning.
In a recent blog post, he describes the process they followed and includes comments from his peers, some of whom disagreed with him.
Check out Waldo’s blog, “the waldo way”, and offer your own views.
Handling parallel sessions in SaaS and on-prem
Codeunit 490, Parallel Session Management, is great for managing multiple sessions in BC on-premises, but it can have severe consequences when used in a SaaS environment.
For starters, it can occupy a session for up to 3600 seconds, polling ActiveSession, which can be costly for shared resources with concurrency caps and timeout policies.
Stefano Demiliani steps through the issues with using Codeunit 490 and offers alternatives for SaaS-based BC platforms.
Read Dynamics 365 Business Central: the mystery around the “Parallel Session Management” codeunit to find out more.
Comparing Production and Sandbox SaaS environments
Yun Zhu tackles an interesting question: What is the difference between Business Central production and sandbox environments?
In a recent blog, he compares the two environments from several viewpoints, including:
- Performance
- VSCode extension limitations
- Included environments
- Backup and restore capabilities
- Features unique to sandbox environments
He even addresses how to determine whether the current environment is Sandbox or Production.
Check out his blog, Dynamics 365 Business Central Cloud: Production vs. Sandbox Environments – Key Differences, to learn more.
Are you interested in Dynamics NAV and Business Central development? Check out our collection of NAV/BC Development Blogs.
Read “How To” blogs from ArcherPoint by Cherry Bekaert for practical advice on using Microsoft Dynamics NAV and Dynamics 365 Business Central.
Trending Posts
- Login Error: Communication protocol mismatch between client and server
- How to Make Measures Total Correctly in Power BI Tables
- The Microsoft Technology Stack – What Is It & Why Should You Care?
- MRP vs. MPS: Choosing the Right Planning Approach for Your Manufacturing Business
- Guide to How Manufacturers Can Implement Quality Control Systems Using Business Central
Stay Informed
Subscribe to Communications
"*required" indicates required fields